Vienna, Austria’s capital city, is a major hub for arbitration in Europe, and the Vienna International ArbitralCentre of the Federal Economic Chamber (VIAC) is not only the most important arbitration institution inAustria, but also one of the leading arbitration institutions in Europe, especially regarding disputes relatingto Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe. In addition to VIAC, Vienna also boasts a specializedarbitral panel established by the Vienna Stock and Commodity Exchange. This is a permanent specializedarbitral panel that has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes arising from exchange transactions, i.e.,disputes between members of the Vienna Stock and Commodity Exchange and disputes concerningmerchandise contracts related to the Vienna Stock and Commodity Exchange.
Internationally, dispute resolution through arbitration has several advantages. In particular, arbitrationallows for expeditious proceedings to obtain a final decision. Arbitral awards rendered in Austria aregranted the same effect as a court judgment under Austrian law, while the international treaties signed byAustria facilitate transnational recognition and enforceability of such arbitral awards in more than 150countries worldwide.
Arbitration in Austria is governed by Chapter 6, Part 4 of the CCP, which defines the prerequisites forarbitration including the validity of arbitration agreements and the minimum standards that must beobserved for a fair trial.
The original text of the law dates back to 1895 and, by virtue of the flexibility of the provisions, helpedestablish Austria as an attractive seat for arbitration proceedings. In order to keep the law in line withinternational developments in the field of arbitration, these provisions were fully revised on the basis of theUnited Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law in 2006. Thus, arbitrationin Austria takes place in a frame-work that is familiar to all international practitioners. The new ArbitrationAct applies to arbitration proceedings initiated on or after 1 July 2006 as well as to arbitration agreementsconcluded on or after this date. In 2013, the Austrian legislator even went a step further to ensure thecelerity of arbitral proceedings by, inter alia, providing that challenges to an arbitral award rendered inAustria are to be submitted directly to the Austrian Supreme Court as first and final instance. Effective asof 1 January 2014, this amendment helps prevent lengthy challenge proceedings through all instances ofappeal and, in addition, warrants that a highly qualified and specialized judicial senate (consisting of fiveSupreme Court judges) hears such cases. Furthermore, since the revision of 2013, all matters relating tothe constitution of the arbitral tribunal (including challenge and replacement of arbitrators) are alsosubmitted to this specialized senate of the Supreme Court. This will undoubtedly further enhance Austria’sinternational reputation in arbitration.
Generally, an arbitration agreement may be concluded between parties for both existing and future civilclaims that may arise out of or in connection with a defined legal relationship. Exceptions include:
-public law matters, including marital and family matters;
-penal law matters;
-tenancy matters, including disputes on the termination of contracts regarding the lease ofapartments;
-claims relating to the Non-Profit Housing Act; and
-collective labour matters and social security law matters.
In addition, arbitration agreements relating to an employment contract (except for managing directors oflimited liability companies and stock corporations) and arbitration agreements between a business and aconsumer have stricter form and content requirements. First, the arbitration agreement may only beconcluded for existing disputes. Moreover, the agreement to arbitrate must be contained in a separatedocument and be personally signed by the consumer/employee (by hand). The seat of arbitration must beexplicitly stipulated. Prior to conclusion of the arbitration agreement, the consumer/employee must havebeen provided with a written notice explaining the significant differences between arbitration and courtproceedings. However, individual negotiation of the arbitration agreement is not required.
The standard prerequisites for the valid conclusion of a legally binding arbitration agreement (if neither anemployee nor a consumer is involved) are by far more lenient: The arbitration agreement must be inwriting and indicate the parties’ intention to submit (certain or any) disputes arising out of a defined legalrelationship to arbitration. Further, the parties may determine the specifics of the arbitral procedure; this isusually done by referring to the rules of a specific arbitral institution, such as VIAC (Vienna Rules), theInternational Chamber of Commerce (ICC) or the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA).
If the parties do not stipulate a specific procedure (be it individually negotiated or by reference to the rulesof an arbitral institution), Austrian law contains a number of default provisions regulating the mostimportant procedural aspects. For example, Austrian law foresees that where there is no agreementbetween the parties, the number of arbitrators shall be three; each party shall appoint one arbitrator andthe two party-appointed arbitrators shall appoint the third arbitrator, who shall serve as the chair of thearbitral tribunal. Should (one of) the parties fail to appoint an arbitrator or the two party-appointedarbitrators fail to appoint a chair, either party may file a request to the Supreme Court to make thenecessary appointment. Austrian law requires that arbitrators must be impartial and independent. The onlyother restriction that parties must observe is that Austrian judges may not accept appointments asarbitrators. Otherwise, the arbitrators may be freely chosen by the parties to the dispute.
Regarding interim measures, Austrian law foresees that an arbitral tribunal’s competence includes theissuance of interim protective measures, unless the parties have agreed otherwise. Any interim measuresshall be issued in writing. However, the arbitral tribunal may ask the requesting party to provideappropriate security prior to ordering interim measures. The competence of an arbitral tribunal to issueinterim protective measures does not affect or limit a party’s right to request a state court to order interimmeasures. In any case, arbitral tribunals have no authority to enforce interim measures.
Interim measures must always be enforced by the state courts. Specifically, the competent district courtshall enforce such measures upon the request of a party. Where an order for an interim measure providesfor a means of protection unknown under Austrian law, the district court may upon request enforce suchorder nonetheless by means of the legal instrument under Austrian law which comes closest to themeasure ordered by the arbitral tribunal.
Austrian courts generally enforce interim measures issued by arbitral tribunals, regardless of whether ornot the seat of arbitration is within Austria. The list of grounds for refusal is limited and a district court mayonly refuse enforcement if:
-the seat of arbitration is in Austria and the measure suffers from a defect which constitutesgrounds for setting aside an arbitral award;
-the seat of arbitration is not in Austria and the measure suffers from a defect which wouldconstitute grounds for refusal to recognise and enforce a foreign arbitral award;
-the enforcement would be incompatible with an earlier Austrian or foreign court measure; or
-the means of protection is unknown under Austrian law and no appropriate means as providedby Austrian law were requested.
Upon request of a party, the district court shall set aside the enforcement if:
-the term of the measure as set by the arbitral tribunal has expired;
-the arbitral tribunal has limited the scope of or set aside the measure;
-a change of circumstances has made the order unnecessary (including that the claim to besecured has been found to be unjustified); or
-security was provided, making the enforcement unnecessary.
Austrian law contains an exhaustive list of the grounds for challenging arbitral awards (Section 611 CCP).Such grounds for challenge include:
-lack of jurisdiction;
-lack of due process;
-improper composition of the arbitral tribunal;
-violation of the Austrian procedural ordre public;
-non-arbitrability of the subject matter;
-grounds for retrial under civil procedural law; and
-violation of the Austrian substantive ordre public.
A challenge must be filed within 3 (three) months from the notification of the award.
Overall, Austrian courts have a very friendly attitude towards arbitration. Consequently, Austrianbusinesses are generally willing to conclude an arbitration agreement, especially in the context ofinternational business transactions.
Taking effect as of 1 January 2018, VIAC has introduced revised arbitration rules (Vienna Rules) andmediation rules (Vienna Mediation Rules). The most significant amendment is VIAC's new competence toadminister domestic disputes. In this context, VIAC has adjusted its administration fees (i.e. reduced its feesfor smaller amounts in dispute and enhanced its fees for larger amounts in dispute) and grants the SecretaryGeneral a wider discretion to determine the fees for the institution and the arbitrators depending on thespecific circumstances of a case. Finally, the simultaneous revision of the mediation rules demonstratesVIAC's commitment to offer both arbitration and mediation services as well as a combination thereof.
2. ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGNARBITRAL AWARDS
Regarding the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, Austria is party to the 1958 New York Convention onthe Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Austria acceded to the Convention in 1961,with the reservation that the Convention will only be applied to the recognition and enforcement of awardsmade in the territory of another contracting State. However, in 1988, Austria withdrew this reservation.Furthermore, Austria is also party to the 1961 European Convention on International CommercialArbitration. Thus, if both Conventions are applicable to an arbitral award to be recognised and enforced inAustria, Article IX of the European Convention stipulates as follows: if the arbitral award was set aside inthe country where it was made, only certain grounds of setting aside justify the refusal of recognition andenforcement. In particular, the violation of the ordre public is not such a ground and is thus not a legalobstacle for recognition and enforcement. Finally, Austria is a party to the Convention on the Settlement ofInvestment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention).
TYPE OF PROCEEDINGS
PROCEDURE AND ASSUMPTIONS
Limited. Usually the International Bar Association Rules on the Taking of Evidence areapplied which provide for a narrow document production.
The usual duration of arbitration proceedings is between 8 months and 2 years.
-The costs of arbitration to a large extentdepend on the arbitration agreementand the amount in dispute, the amountof documents, number of witnesses andwhether expert opinions are required.The costs of arbitration also include thefees of arbitrators and administrativecharges.
-The arbitrators usually have largediscretion regarding the award of costs.However, in practice the award on costsoften depends on the outcome of thecase. The award of legal fees is usuallynot determined by reference to astatutory tariff.
The procedural costs depend on whether asole arbitrator or an arbitral tribunal of threemembers is appointed, the complexity of thecase and the administrative charges.
The following two estimates are based onthe procedural costs of the Rules ofArbitration and Conciliation of the ViennaInternational Arbitral Centre (VIAC).
Assumption: sole arbitrator appointedand an amount in dispute of EUR1,000,000.
Total costs: registration fee of EUR 1,500,administrative fees of EUR 13,000 and feesfor a sole arbitrator between EUR 26,500and EUR 37,100.
Assumption: sole arbitrator and anamount in dispute of EUR 10,000,000.
Procedural costs: registration fee of EUR1,500; administrative fees of EUR 24,900and fees for a sole arbitrator between EUR74,500 and EUR 104,300.
In the case there is an arbitral tribunal withthree arbitrators, it may be that the fees forthe arbitrators triple.
Assumptions based on an amount indispute of EUR 1,000,000: review of 100pages of documents; no challenge to thejurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal; twoexchanges of submissions; review ofcorrespondence with arbitral tribunal;assistance with the preparation of 3witnesses; review of 3 written witnessstatements; no experts; preparation of oralhearing and participation in an oral hearing;preparation and review of one post hearingbrief. Total approximate cost: EUR 120,000.
Assumptions based on an amount indispute of EUR 10,000,000: review of 1000pages of documents; no challenge to thejurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal; twoexchanges of submissions; review ofcorrespondence with arbitral tribunal;assistance with the preparation of 5witnesses; review of 5 written witnessstatements; document production up to 500pages; preparation and review of expertopinions; preparation of oral hearing andparticipation in an oral hearing; preparationand review of one post hearing brief. Totalapproximate cost: EUR 250,000.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
-For enforcement of awards under theNew York Convention, the creditor mustprovide the court with the authenticatedoriginal award or a duly certified copythereof and the original of thearbitration agreement or a duly certifiedcopy thereof.
For a declaration of enforceability no courtfees have to be paid. For specific executionactions court fees are based on the CourtFees Act.
Application for recognition/enforcement:
Simple case: EUR 400 to 600.
Complex case: EUR 2,000 to 5,000.
ATTORNEYS’ FEES (NET)
1 to 2 months until a decision on recognitionand enforcement is rendered in first instance.3 to 6 months if the decision is appealed.
The information in this chapter was correct as of 1 January 2018. If you have any questions about the content of this chapter,
or would like further information about arbitration in Austria, please contact